Future Proof the Environment and Tech Stack
Abstract
- A modern Data Office requires a cloud-native, modular, lakehouse-based architecture.
- Key layers include ingestion, lakehouse, cataloging, quality, BI, and security.
- Preferred tools include Databricks, dbt, Collibra/Purview, Great Expectations, and Tableau (or Power BI as an optional enhancement).
- Execution takes 24 months across foundation, pilot, scale, and optimization phases.
- Environment should support governance, analytics, AI, and compliance equally.
- Total 2-year cost: $2M–$3M, excluding staffing.
Objective of the Environment Strategy
To build a robust, secure, and cloud-native data environment that supports enterprise data governance, analytics, quality management, and real-time operations, while remaining modular and adaptable to emerging technologies and AI initiatives.
Benefits
- End-to-end visibility and control over enterprise data
- Easier collaboration between IT, business, and data teams
- Higher data quality and trust across business-critical domains
- Foundation for AI, predictive maintenance, connected vehicle analytics
- Regulatory and cybersecurity compliance at scale
- Vendor-agnostic and modular design for future tech evolution
Ideal Environment Principles
- Modular: Easily replaceable components (e.g., switch from Airbyte to Informatica if scaling)
- Open Standards: Prefer open-source (dbt, Airflow, Great Expectations) where practical
- Security First: Central identity access management (Azure AD / AWS IAM) + encryption
- Federated Governance: Allow business units to contribute to metadata and policies
- AI-Ready: Tag and prepare datasets for model training, monitoring, and drift detection
Modernized Architecture with Existing Stack
Below is how to integrate and evolve your current tools into a robust, future-proof architecture:
1. Data Ingestion & Integration Layer
Current Tools:
- Informatica: ETL for batch loads
- Cleo: B2B/EDI file transfer
- Apigee: API gateway
Recommendations:
- Keep Informatica for legacy ETL and large-volume batch processing
- Modernize by introducing dbt + Airflow/Prefect for ELT and transformation modularity
- Use AWS Glue + Lambda for event-driven or near-real-time ingestion
- Standardize API-based ingestion through Apigee for all external-facing data flows
- Use Cleo for secure B2B data, but plan eventual migration to REST+JSON or SFTP+AWS Transfer Family
2. Storage & Processing Layer
Current Tools:
- Snowflake: Scalable cloud warehouse
- PostgreSQL: Operational databases
Recommendations:
- Continue using Snowflake as your primary enterprise data warehouse
- Use PostgreSQL for operational data and staging areas
- Create a logical data lake by integrating Snowflake with S3 and optionally layering Apache Iceberg for future data lake flexibility
- If multi-cloud or on-prem integration is needed, consider Starburst/Trino for federated querying
3. Transformation & Data Engineering Layer
Current Tools:
- AWS Glue + Lambda
- Informatica
Recommendations:
- Introduce dbt (Data Build Tool) on top of Snowflake for declarative, modular SQL transformations
- Use Airflow or Prefect to orchestrate dbt, Glue jobs, and notifications
- Retain Glue for Spark-based jobs, but refactor toward dbt when feasible (especially for team collaboration, versioning, and testability)
4. Governance & Metadata Layer
Current Tools:
None at the moment, RFQ in review process (Informatica and Collivra are top contenders as of May 2025)
Recommendations:
- Pick the top choice from Informatica, Collibra, AWs or Sales Force as a unified data catalog and governance layer
- Auto-ingest metadata from Snowflake, PostgreSQL, Glue, dbt, and APIs
- Define business glossaries, tag PII data, and integrate with Dynatrace for observability/lineage
5. Data Quality & Observability Layer
Current Tools:
Dynatrace (mainly app observability)
Recommendations:
- Continue using Dynatrace for system and API monitoring
- Introduce Great Expectations or Soda.io for data quality checks, or build on Sales Force / Informatica offerings depending on the choice of the ongoing RFQ
- Integrate with dbt and Snowflake to monitor data freshness, completeness, and anomalies
- Long term: unify dashboards in Power BI or Grafana for both data + system observability
6. Access & Analytics Layer
Current Tools:
Tableau (primary BI platform)
Recommendations:
- Continue using Tableau, fully integrated with Snowflake for governed, performant analytics.
- Optionally pilot Power BI for Microsoft-native integration and cost efficiency (especially if bundled with Microsoft 365 or Purview).
- Enable self-service analytics via role-based access to curated views and datasets in Snowflake.
- Embed dashboards into apps via Tableau REST API or Apigee → leverage dynamic filters and row-level security.
- For field and mobile use cases, consider lightweight embedded analytics or Tableau Mobile as part of the delivery strategy.
Value-Add Smart Suggestions
| Need | Smart Suggestion |
|---|---|
| Transformation Scalability | Add dbt Cloud for analytics engineering best practices, with version control and CI/CD |
| API Governance | Use Apigee + AWS API Gateway for full lifecycle management of internal and external APIs |
| Real-Time Analytics | Add Kinesis (or Kafka if vendor-neutral) to enable vehicle telemetry or service event streams |
| Data Science / AI | Use Snowflake’s Snowpark or SageMaker Studio for AI model development on governed datasets |
| Lineage & Collaboration | Informatica, Sales Force, AWS or Collibra integration with dbt, Glue, and Snowflake for end-to-end lineage and steward workflows |
| BI Consolidation | Use Tableau as the core BI layer. Optionally evaluate Power BI if pursuing full Microsoft stack. |
Hybrid Data Architecture with Data Office Integration
flowchart TD
%% Source Systems
A1[ERP / CRM / Legacy Systems]
A2[IOT Devices / Vehicle Sensors]
A3["3rd Party APIs / Partners (via Apigee)"]
A4["Flat Files / FTP (via Cleo)"]
%% Ingestion Layer
A1 --> B1[Informatica ETL Jobs]
A2 --> B2[AWS Lambda Functions]
A3 --> B3[Apigee Gateway]
A4 --> B4[Cleo Connectors]
B1 --> C1["Landing Zone (S3 / RDS / Postgres)"]
B2 --> C1
B3 --> C1
B4 --> C1
%% Processing & Transformation
C1 --> D1[AWS Glue ETL]
C1 --> D2[Lambda Transformations]
D1 --> E1[Snowflake Data Warehouse]
D2 --> E1
%% Serving & Access
E1 --> F1[Power BI / Tableau]
E1 --> F2[Custom Apps / Dashboards]
E1 --> F3["Data Science Sandbox (Jupyter, SageMaker)"]
%% Governance & Metadata
E1 --> G1[Microsoft Purview / Atlan]
C1 --> G1
G1 --> G2[Data Catalog & Lineage]
G1 --> G3["Data Classification (Level 0/1/2)"]
G1 --> G4["Data Access Policies (Snowflake Roles)"]
%% Monitoring & Quality
E1 --> H1[Dynatrace / Soda.io]
D1 --> H1
%% Compliance & Privacy
G3 --> I1["CCPA / GDPR Request Workflow (ServiceNow)"]
I1 --> D1
Key Concepts:
- Hybrid Ingestion: Mix of batch (Informatica, Cleo) and streaming/serverless (Lambda, Apigee)
- Modern Warehouse: Snowflake as a central cloud warehouse
- Flexible Transformation: Using Glue for ETL and Lambda for event-driven cases
- Governance Layer: Purview or Atlan integrates with both raw and modeled data
- Compliance Hooks: PII tagging and deletion/redaction triggered from Purview to Glue
- Monitoring: Dynatrace + optional Soda.io for quality and observability
Execution Timeline (Phased Upgrade)
| Phase | Months | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 0–3 | Introduce dbt + Airflow; formalize metadata strategy |
| Phase 2 | 3–6 | Integrate catalog (Purview/Atlan); enable observability with Soda/GE |
| Phase 3 | 6–12 | Shift legacy pipelines to dbt; enrich lineage, implement PII tagging |
| Phase 4 | 12–18 | Enable ML, real-time pipelines; build self-service BI & API ecosystems |
Estimated Additional Cost (First 2 Years)
| Category | Add-On Tools | Annual Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| dbt Cloud (Team Plan) | Transformation | $20K–$50K |
| Atlan / Purview | Governance & Catalog | $80K–$200K |
| Soda / Great Expectations | Data Quality | $20K–$40K |
| Tableau (existing license) | Analytics | Already licensed |
| Optional: Power BI | Analytics (if added) | $50K–$100K |
| Airflow (managed) | Orchestration | $10K–$30K |
| Training & Integration | Vendor setup, team enablement | ~$100K |
| Total New Spend (Year 1–2) | – | $300K–$500K/year on top of existing stack |
Risks & Remedies
Risks:
- Legacy systems blocking integration or standardization
- Downtime or pipeline failures with growing complexity
- Escalating cloud storage and compute costs
Remedies:
- Incrementally retire legacy tools by building adapters and transition plans
- Monitor pipeline SLAs and introduce retry/failover mechanisms
- Implement FinOps practices and cost alerts for Snowflake, AWS, etc.